Thomas Burkhalter (Bern, 1973) is a cultural producer, founder and
editor-in-chief of
Norient
(International Network for Local & Global Sounds and Media Culture),
the organism that has curated the great exhibition
Seismographic Sounds. Visions of a New World,
opened during Transmediale and CTM festivals at the end of January and
running till the 20th of March – therefore, last chance to check it out!
The show is an anthropologic document of our current times, and there is
also an
exhibition’s namesake book, which introduces you to a contemporary world of distinct music, sounds,
music videos and hints. Among other things, they prognosticate that
mainstream hits and underground trends of the future will come from
Africa, Asia and Latin America. Burkhalter is likewise director of the
Norient Musikfilm Festival in Switzerland, and a documentary filmmaker as
well. We talked with this multifaceted man about “every” aspect of music
nowadays.
You present yourself as ethnomusicologist. For those not familiar with the
word, ethnomusicologists approach music as a social process in order to
understand not only what music is, but what it means to its practitioners
and audiences, and how those meanings are conveyed. But isn't that what
every musicologist would do? How can music be separated from its cultural,
social, material, cognitive, biological context?
I think I call myself ethnomusicologist because in the last years I have
been studying this field and I feel I'm part of a generation that wants to
change it. We are more focused in cities; we try to work with experimental
music, subcultures and in any places where we have other interesting
things going on. So I work in different topics and I also use other
methods… There are some musicologists that just study the sound, specially
in the academic environment. They analyse the music score, what is
innovative, what is new and so on, but they don't care about the
context.
I see. They study Beethoven, his music and his scores, but they do not
care about his life and how Germanic culture, philosophy, or literature
influenced him. That’s weird…
Well, it is like this, some musicologists only analyse the score, not even
the sound. But our new generation doesn't believe in the score, we do
believe in the music. We work with musicians that maybe cannot read a
score, and even if they can, it doesn't mean that they will play it 100%
as it is written. The recording is the score nowadays. We try to discuss
what we hear, rather than what we see. If you only analyse the score, you
cannot be precise enough.
Norient is a network for local and global sounds and media culture. To
what do you refer by “media”? It's a confusing term.
We use “media” in a broad sense, but basically as “medium”. I will explain
myself better: audiovisual items (films, music, etc.) are produced and
then distributed across the globe via different media-channels, like the
internet, TV or radio. All the references people sample from are often
taken from media channels –for example, films from the 1980–. This is what
we call "media cultures": many types of media/mediums surrounding us –
screens, devices, TV, radio or internet to mention some.
Music is considered by the popular (pop) as an emotional “game”, a product
completely controlled by the capital (music labels, distribution,
marketing, etc.). It engages people because of the emotions, but also
because of the trends. Is there “another type music”, intellectual and
emotional at the same time, beyond the reach of politics and market?
I believe commercial music is the same as independent music –understood as
not mainstream, not massive market focus–. It is difficult to see who are
the actors and the power behind a certain kind of music. Today, mainstream
pop culture in general is dominated by capital, but on the other hand,
independent artists that created alternative or avant-garde music are
maybe supported by family or friends who could be connected to capital as
well: bankers, big companies' managers… If you travel out of Europe,
sometimes it's not so nice to know where money comes from. Even in my
country, Switzerland, money often comes from corruption.
I was also referring to the fact that maybe some artists don't want to be
mainstream: avant-garde, noise, synthetic sound production or music based
on field recording.
Yes, definitely, this kind of music cannot reach the same public as pop
music, because it is very, very different. Moreover, the purpose is
different. But in any case, things are not black or white. Sometimes
artists try to make music that sounds mainstream to reach the population,
but they do experimental stuff as well.
There was a band, many years ago, called Corner Shop, from the UK. They were number one with their first EP in the lists in Great Britain and due to that they were invited to their first TV show. The surprise was that they were all Pakistani, but really sounded as brit-pop. They became mainstream to show that Pakistani –not just white– people living in Britain were also part of Great Britain, and that mainstream music could be done by anyone (again, not just by whites). As you see, there are different types of strategies on how to reach the public.
There was a band, many years ago, called Corner Shop, from the UK. They were number one with their first EP in the lists in Great Britain and due to that they were invited to their first TV show. The surprise was that they were all Pakistani, but really sounded as brit-pop. They became mainstream to show that Pakistani –not just white– people living in Britain were also part of Great Britain, and that mainstream music could be done by anyone (again, not just by whites). As you see, there are different types of strategies on how to reach the public.
In the music world, what or who do you consider as outsiders? Out of the
commercial circuit, independent scene and so on.
I don't know… I like people who have a passion for something, even if it's
building his own computer or her own car, or making very strange music. I
reckon that all these people with a strong passion for something are
somehow outsiders: what mainstream consider out of the norm, strange,
nerds. And all these nerds and freaks are the musicians I work with, it's
alright to have a platform for all the outsiders in order to give them
some visibility. This is what we do in Norient. I believe this is what
counts.
It is very common for musicians to work in advertising, commercial movies
or video games to earn money, to pay their bills and survive; and then
they do the music they really want to do, playing in specialized festivals
and so on. I have talked to some musicians that don't want people to know
about their commercial stuff… Is that part of our schizoid-society, a
constant divergence between what we do and what we want to do?
Yes, some artists try to hide it, I don't know why. When I work in Africa
and abroad, I meet all these musicians that make alternative music, and
the crowd assume they're poor and what they do is really vocational. But
normally it's not the case – to do experimental music, money to support
the project is needed as well. Sometimes I have been in rehearsals of
alternative music bands or metal bands in really huge rich villas, and
it's difficult to determine if these bands are producing the money to have
this type of houses, maybe they do. Or maybe they do more commercial stuff
besides the alternative one as well.
My last economic question is based on the post-internet era. I am saying
“post” not meaning “after”, but in the sense that it has become the
default by means of communication, and no other paradigm can compete with
it. Are we also living in post-capitalism, as no other economic system
seems to be possible?
In the music scene, all I can say is that everyone is trying to find a way
to finance their projects and their living as an artist. It's a time of
experimentation, no one knows how to make money from contemporary, arty
music. The music economic system does't exist anymore, labels are falling
apart, sales are gone – only mainstream music exists. Spotify takes over
everything, all they publish is for free and they don't give any revenue
to the musician. Facebook was very good for an organization like Norient
at the beginning, we could publish in our page what we were doing so the
followers were updated and our content was spread quickly. But now, they
changed the algorithm – if you do not reply constantly to everyone, you
get lower in the position of being shown, and you don't arrive to your
followers, you need to pay and this isn't in our philosophy as a
collective. Hence, basically what we do every year is to build a profile
in a new social media platform. Sound Cloud is good for us now, but maybe
we'll be changing soon, and we'll need to pay for using it…
Lets move to the exhibition
Seismographic sounds - Visions of a New World. I am curious, what do you mean by “new world”?
Well, I've been traveling a lot in the last 15 years and I've found many
musicians in different countries doing music outside of the standard
circuits of Europe and the US, but it is not commercial stuff. These
artists in Africa, Asia and Latin America do songs about their country:
Ghana, Senegal, Lebanon, etc. We're building a network, a community that
tries to experiment and wants to create music with quality, caring about
content. By doing so, we try to show a world that is not just black and
white, to break the idea that someone from Beirut has to sound Arabic, and
someone from Africa has to sound African. They are the ones promoting a
new world, one that it is not targeted in our comfortable western system.
We are living difficult times with refugees, there's never been so many
people leaving their countries because of war and violence since WWII.
Nevertheless, more than 80% of the population worldwide wants to live in
peace, without conflicts and longing to move forward with their lives.
Musicians are part of this 80% – they want to show that there is another
side to be seen every day.
The main piece within the exhibition revolves around six topics –music in
relation to money, loneliness, war, belonging, exotica and desire–. Are
these ideas what better define modern Western societies?
Not at all. Let me explain how we arrived to the six topics. We
wanted to give a complete global picture of what is going on, musically
speaking, nowadays, and consequently, we launched an open call for
musicians to submit tracks and clips to Norient. We received more than
1000 submissions from all over the planet. Afterwards, we did a huge excel
sheet with tags such as “money, love, gun shots, war, bomb, etc.” The tags
we worked with were found either in the title, heard in the lyrics or seen
in the videos.
The six topics selected were the most repeated in our study. In fact, "loneliness" is the only topic we found in Europe and the US, the rest were worldwide. War, for example, was found in places where, of course, there's war; but also in places where there isn't, like the UK. Some people are fascinated by it, they use sounds of bombs in the base to make it stronger, for example. Thus, you see, it's the same subject with different motivations.
The six topics selected were the most repeated in our study. In fact, "loneliness" is the only topic we found in Europe and the US, the rest were worldwide. War, for example, was found in places where, of course, there's war; but also in places where there isn't, like the UK. Some people are fascinated by it, they use sounds of bombs in the base to make it stronger, for example. Thus, you see, it's the same subject with different motivations.
The exhibition’s namesake book
Seismographic sounds - Visions of a New World
features artists, sound cultures and projects coming from localities
operating on the fringes of the electronic music circuit, all around the
world. Could you please comment on this?
As said before, I have been studying music around the world for more than
twelve years now. I don't know why people believe this topic is somehow
special. I think it is a logic approach, because the world is diverse – it
is not about Europe and the US anymore. It's about time to pay attention
to the music produced in the world we live in, and to diversity. The book
features punk in Bolivia and Indonesia, electronic music in Egypt,
underground pop from South Africa and Nigeria, rap in Pakistan, Serbia,
Chile and Ghana, noise music from Israel, post digital pop from UK, Neuer
Konzeptualismus…
Let's talk about “exoticism" or "exotica”. In a conversation between you
and Martin Stokes, called
The Banalization of the Exotic, Stokes
connects “exotica” to the ideas of othering, primitivism, ethnicity,
orientalism and colonialism. What's your view on this?
There are many artists in Africa and other places parodying exoticism,
what “we” in western culture understand as “exotica”. Yet, the downside of
it is that it's easier for a musician from Africa, an Arabic country or
Latin America –to mention a few– to make music with a local touch or
flavour. If they don't add this “touch”, sounding completely placeless,
experts become nervous. Curators suppose, to a certain extent, that an
African musician should sound African, and I consider that's a really bad
thing.
For example, I am in Nigeria and I am fascinated by death metal, why am I not allowed to do amazing death metal music in Nigeria? Why do I need to sound African to be considered a good musician? I actually understand this kind of thoughts as racist, in a way. Good music is made by many influences and references, and now more than ever, where you are “siting” right now is the less important aspect of it.
For example, I am in Nigeria and I am fascinated by death metal, why am I not allowed to do amazing death metal music in Nigeria? Why do I need to sound African to be considered a good musician? I actually understand this kind of thoughts as racist, in a way. Good music is made by many influences and references, and now more than ever, where you are “siting” right now is the less important aspect of it.
We have talked about the internet and the use of computers and new ways to
access to music, could you please elaborate on the concept of “digital
cultures”?
I do consider musicians and artists that are very much dependent on the
internet and the use of open source software as digital cultures
representatives. In the case of music, it is produced entirely in a
computer, with free copies of software, hacked versions, freeware… This is
what we call digital culture. Internet also inspires the works these
cultures produce. I met many musicians in Pakistan last year, and a lot of
them learn music or how to make it through YouTube tutorials. If you don't
have music schools with the subjects you want to learn, YouTube has became
an educational tool: experts or skilled people upload videos teaching how
to play an instrument or use a piece of software to compose music.
Let's go over another of your roles. You organize a music film festival in
Switzerland, The Norient Musikfilm Festival. What can you tell us about
it?
Oh, it is working very well, and for us it's the best time of the year! It
has a lot of support from the public. We've created a program of films
that have music as their main theme, and we bring the directors along to
present the movie to the audience. In addition, we program live
performances and panel discussions with musicians, DJs and record labels.
The 7th edition was in January, and we projected documentaries, movies and
videoclips about metal, rap, punk, rock, 20th century classical music and
musique concrete from around the world. Plus, the festival is celebrated
simultaneously in three cities: Bern, Laussane and St. Gallen.
And, last by not least, you are also a documentary filmmaker. Are you
involved in some documentary project at the moment?
Yes, I am. I am co-directing, together with Peter Guyer, a documentary
about protest and music today. It is produced by Norient (me) and Recycle
TV (Peter). We've already filmed some amazing local rappers in Ghana, and
additionally we'll be shooting a great noise artist in Israel. I leave you
the teaser for the material we got in Ghana, it is a XL teaser though
(around 25 minutes), but better seeing it than talking about it!